Abstract
AbstractPopulation extinction is ubiquitous in all taxa. Such extirpations can reduce intraspecific diversity, but the extent to which genetic diversity of surviving populations are affected remains largely unclear. A key concept in this context is the effective population size (Ne), which quantifies the rate at which genetic diversity within populations is lost. Ne was developed for single, isolated populations while many natural populations are instead connected to other populations via gene flow. Recent analytical approaches and software permit modelling of Ne of interconnected populations (metapopulations). Here, we apply such tools to investigate how extinction of subpopulations affects Ne of the metapopulation (NeMeta) and of separate surviving subpopulations (NeRx) under different rates and patterns of genetic exchange between subpopulations. We assess extinction effects before and at migration-drift equilibrium. We find that the effect of extinction on NeMeta increases with reduced connectivity, suggesting that stepping stone models of migration are more impacted than island-migration models when the same number of subpopulations are lost. Furthermore, in stepping stone models, after extinction and before a new equilibrium has been reached, NeRx can vary drastically among surviving subpopulations and depends on their initial spatial position relative to extinct ones. Our results demonstrate that extinctions can have far more complex effects on the retention of intraspecific diversity than typically recognized. Metapopulation dynamics need heightened consideration in sustainable management and conservation, e.g., in monitoring genetic diversity, and are relevant to a wide range of species in the ongoing extinction crisis.
Funder
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Vetenskapsrådet
Havs- och Vattenmyndigheten
Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning
Stockholm University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Genetics,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference79 articles.
1. Allendorf FW, Ryman N (2002) The role of genetics in population viability analysis. Population viability analysis. University of Chicago press, Chicago, pp 50–85
2. Allendorf FW, Luikart G, Aitken SN (2007) Conservation and the genetics of populations. Mammalia 2007:189–197
3. Allendorf FW, England PR, Luikart G, Ritchie PA, Ryman N (2008) Genetic effects of harvest on wild animal populations. Trends Ecol Evol 23(6):327–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.02.008
4. Andersson A, Karlsson S, Ryman N, Laikre L (2022) Monitoring genetic diversity with new indicators applied to an alpine freshwater top predator. Mol Ecol 31:6422–6439. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16710
5. Bensch S, Grahn M, Müller N, Gay L, Åkesson S (2009) Genetic, morphological, and feather isotope variation of migratory willow warblers show gradual divergence in a ring. Mol Ecol 18(14):3087–3096. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04210.x
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献