Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Chat generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) is a novel large pre-trained natural language processing software that can enable scientific writing amongst a litany of other features. Given this, there is a growing interest in exploring the use of ChatGPT models as a modality to facilitate/assist in the provision of clinical care.
Methods
We investigated the time taken for the composition of neurosurgical discharge summaries and operative reports at a major University hospital. In so doing, we compared currently employed speech recognition software (i.e., SpeaKING) vs novel ChatGPT for three distinct neurosurgical diseases: chronic subdural hematoma, spinal decompression, and craniotomy. Furthermore, factual correctness was analyzed for the abovementioned diseases.
Results
The composition of neurosurgical discharge summaries and operative reports with the assistance of ChatGPT leads to a statistically significant time reduction across all three diseases/report types: p < 0.001 for chronic subdural hematoma, p < 0.001 for decompression of spinal stenosis, and p < 0.001 for craniotomy and tumor resection. However, despite a high degree of factual correctness, the preparation of a surgical report for craniotomy proved to be significantly lower (p = 0.002).
Conclusion
ChatGPT assisted in the writing of discharge summaries and operative reports as evidenced by an impressive reduction in time spent as compared to standard speech recognition software. While promising, the optimal use cases and ethics of AI-generated medical writing remain to be fully elucidated and must be further explored in future studies.
Funder
Universitätsmedizin Rostock
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference14 articles.
1. Baker A, Perov Y, Middleton K, Baxter J, Mullarkey D, Sangar D, Butt M, DoRosario A, Johri S (2020) A comparison of artificial intelligence and human doctors for the purpose of triage and diagnosis. Front Artif Intell. https://doi.org/10.3389/FRAI.2020.543405
2. Bang Y, Cahyawijaya S, Lee N, et al (2023) A multitask, multilingual, multimodal evaluation of ChatGPT on reasoning, hallucination, and interactivity. AACL 2023, pp 45. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.04023
3. ChatGPT banned in Italy over privacy concerns - BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-65139406. Accessed 3 Apr 2023
4. ChatGPT: how to use the AI chatbot taking over the world | Digital Trends. https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/how-to-use-openai-chatgpt-text-generation-chatbot/. Accessed 22 Jan 2023
5. Gao CA, Howard FM, Markov NS, Dyer EC, Ramesh S, Luo Y, Pearson AT (2023) Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers. NPJ Digit Med 6(1):1–5
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献