Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference28 articles.
1. Johnson RG, Cohn WE, Thurer RL, McCarthy JR, Sirois CA, Weintraub RM (1997) Cutaneous closure after cardiac operations: a controlled, randomized, prospective comparison of subcuticular versus staple closures. Ann Surg 226:606–612
2. Shetty AA, Kumar VS, Morgan-Hough C, Georgeu GA, James KD, Nicholl JE (2004) Comparing wound complication rates following closure of hip wounds with metallic skin staples or subcuticular vicryl suture: a prospective randomised trial. J Orthop Surg 12:191–193
3. Basha SL, Rochon ML, Quiñones JN, Coassolo KM, Rust OA, Smulian JC (2010) Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(285):e1-8
4. Tsujinaka T, Yamamoto K, Fujita J, Endo S, Kawada J, Nakahira S et al (2013) Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after open gastrointestinal surgery: a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 382:1105–1112
5. Kobayashi S, Ito M, Yamamoto S, Kinugasa Y, Kotake M, Saida Y et al (2015) Randomized clinical trial of skin closure by subcuticular suture or skin stapling after elective colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 102:495–500