Author:
Aguirre-Allende Ignacio,Alkorta-Zuloaga Maialen,Iglesias-Gaspar Maria Teresa,Urreta-Ballobre Iratxe,García-Domínguez Amaia,Arteaga-Martin Xabier,Beguiristain-Gómez Adolfo,Medrano-Gómez Miguel Ángel,Ruiz-Montesinos Inmaculada,Riverola-Aso Ana Paula,Jiménez-Agüero Raúl,Enríquez-Navascués José María
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Subcuticular suture has proven to reduce superficial incisional SSI (si-SSI) in clean surgery. However, question remains regarding clean-contaminated procedures. The aim of this study is to assess if subcuticular suture is superior to staples in reducing si-SSI incidence in elective HBP surgery.
Methods
Single-centre, open-label, parallel, pragmatic randomized clinical trial conducted at a referral tertiary Hospital between January 2020 and April 2022. Patients eligible for elective HBP surgery were randomly assigned (1:1) to subcuticular suture or surgical staples wound closure using a minimisation method based on previously confirmed risk factors. The primary endpoint was the incidence of si-SSI. Considered secondary endpoints were major postoperative morbidity in both groups, additional wound complications, median hospital length of stay and need for re-hospitalisation.
Results
Of the 379 patients, 346 patients were randomly assigned to receive skin closure with staples (n = 173) or subcuticular suture (n = 173). After further exclusion of 11 participants, 167 and 168 patients, respectively in the control and the experimental group received their allocated intervention. For the primary endpoint, no significant differences in si-SSI rate were found: 17 (9.82%) staples group vs. 8 (4.62%) in subcuticular suture group (p = 0.062). Subset analysis confirmed absence of significant differences. As for secondary endpoints, overall wound complications did not differ significantly between two procedures: 19 (10.98%) vs. 10 (6.35%) (p = 0.127). There were no treatment related adverse events. However, occurrence of si-SSI contributed to major postoperative morbidity in both groups (p < 0.001 and p = 0.018) and to a substantially prolonged postoperative hospitalization (p = 0.015).
Conclusions
Subcuticular suture might offer a relative benefit for skin closure reducing incidence of si-SSI after elective HBP surgery, although this was found not to be clinically relevant. Yet, this should not be interpreted as equivalence among both treatments. Therefore, wound closure strategy should not be based only on these grounds.
Trial registration number: ISRCTN Registry number ISRCTN37315612 (registration date: 14/01/2020).
Funder
Osasun Saila, Eusko Jaurlaritzako
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference34 articles.
1. Berríos-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, Leas B, Stone EC, Kelz RR, et al. Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(8):784–91.
2. NICE. Surgical site infections: prevention and treatment NICE guideline (NG125). NICE Guidel. 2019.
3. Mu Y, Edwards JR, Horan TC, Berrios-Torres SI, Fridkin SK. Improving risk-adjusted measures of surgical site infection for the national healthcare safely network. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32(10):970–86.
4. Morikane K. Epidemiology and risk factors associated with surgical site infection after different types of hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery. Surg Today. 2017;47(10):1208–14.
5. WHO. Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, second edition. World Heal Organ. 2018.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献