Modified Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol Versus Non-ERAS Protocol in Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy for Acute Intestinal Obstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
-
Published:2023-09-23
Issue:12
Volume:47
Page:2990-2999
-
ISSN:0364-2313
-
Container-title:World Journal of Surgery
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:World J Surg
Author:
Aggarwal Ankit,
Irrinki Santosh,
Kurdia Kailash C.,
Khare Siddhant,
Naik Naveen,
Tandup Cherring,
Savlania Ajay,
Dahiya Divya,
Kaman Lileswar,
Sakaray YashwantORCID
Reference39 articles.
1. Huddart S, Peden CJ, Swart M et al (2015) Use of a pathway quality improvement care bundle to reduce mortality after emergency laparotomy. Br J Surg 102(1):57–66
2. Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg 152(3):292–298
3. Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L et al (2014) Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 38:1531–1541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2416-8
4. Ni X, Jia D, Chen Y et al (2019) Is the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program effective and safe in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Gastrointest Surg 23:1502–1512
5. Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F et al (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD007635
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献