Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator after transvenous lead extraction: safety, efficacy and outcome

Abstract

Abstract Background Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) is a suitable alternative for transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) patients who have undergone transvenous lead extraction (TLE). Limited data are available on the outcome of S-ICD patients implanted after TLE. We assessed the safety, efficacy, and outcome of S-ICD implantation after TLE of TV-ICD. Methods The study population consisted of 36 consecutive patients with a median age of 52 (44–66) years who underwent S-ICD implantation after TLE of TV-ICD. Results Indications for TLE were infection (63.9%) and lead malfunction (36.1%). During a median follow-up of 31 months, 3 patients (8.3%) experienced appropriate therapy and 7 patients (19.4%) experienced complications including inappropriate therapy (n = 4; 11.1%), isolated pocket erosion (n = 2; 5.5%), and ineffective therapy (n = 1; 2.8%). No lead/hardware dysfunction was reported. Premature device explantation occurred in 4 patients (11%). Eight patients (22.2%) died during follow-up, six of them (75%) because of refractory heart failure (HF). There were no S-ICD-related deaths. Predictors of mortality included NYHA class ≥ 2 (HR 5.05; 95% CI 1.00–26.38; p = 0.04), hypertension (HR 22.72; 95% CI 1.05–26.31; p = 0.02), diabetes (HR 10.64; 95% CI 2.05–55.60; p = 0.001) and ischemic heart disease (HR 5.92; 95% CI 1.17–30.30; p = 0.01). Conclusion Our study provides evidences on the use of S-ICD as an alternative after TV-ICD explantation for both infection and lead failure. Mortality of S-ICD patients who underwent TV-ICD explantation does not appear to be correlated with the presence of a prior infection, S-ICD therapy (appropriate or inappropriate), or S-ICD complications but rather to worsening of HF or other comorbidities.