Transvenous Lead Extraction in a European Low-Volume Center without On-Site Surgical Support

Author:

Dardari Mohamed1ORCID,Iorgulescu Corneliu2,Bataila Vlad1,Deaconu Alexandru12,Cinteza Eliza34ORCID,Vatasescu Radu12ORCID,Padovani Paul5ORCID,Vasile Corina Maria6ORCID,Dorobantu Maria12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania

2. Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing Lab, Clinical Emergency Hospital, 014461 Bucharest, Romania

3. Department of Pediatrics, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania

4. Pediatric Cardiology Department, Marie Sklodowska Curie Children Emergency Hospital, 041451 Bucharest, Romania

5. Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, FHU PRECICARE, F-44000 Nantes, France

6. Pediatric and Adult Congenital Cardiology Department, M3C National Reference Centre, Bordeaux University Hospital, F-33000 Bordeaux, France

Abstract

Indications for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are increasing. Almost one-third of device-related infections are endocarditis. Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) has emerged as an effective and safe approach for treating device-related infections and complications. Multiple types of extraction tools are being used worldwide. Our goal is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of TLE using non-powered extraction tools. The study included patients between October 2018 and July 2022 requiring TLE according to EHRA expert consensus recommendations on lead extraction. A total of 88 consecutive patients were included. Indications for TLE included device-related infections in 74% of the patients. Of those, 32% had device-related endocarditis with or without sepsis. Staphylococcus Aureus was the most frequent pathogen in patients with endocarditis and positive bacteremia, and 57% had negative bloodstream cultures. A total of 150 cardiac pacing and defibrillator leads were targeted for extraction. The mean dwell time for leads was 6.92 ± 4.4 years; 52.8% were older than 5 years, 15.8% were older than ten years, and the longest lead dwell time was 26 years. Patients’ age varied between 18 and 98, with a mean age of 66 ± 16 years. Sixty-seven percent of patients were males. Using only non-powered extraction tools, we report 93.3% complete lead removal and 99% clinical success with partial extraction. We report no procedure-related death nor major complications. Minor complication incidence was 6.8%, and all complications resolved spontaneously. The 30-day mortality rate was 3.4%. TLE using non-powered extraction tools is safe and effective even without surgical backup on site.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,Water Science and Technology,Geography, Planning and Development

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3