Towards a social constructionist, criticalist, Foucauldian-informed qualitative research approach: Opportunities and challenges

Author:

Phillips Matthew J.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn this paper, I delve into the application of a social constructionist, critical, and Foucauldian approach, and shed light on the complexities and nuances that arise when studying human behaviour and societal dynamics. While social constructionism offers valuable insights into how social action is constructed within everyday interactions in political and socio-cultural contexts, it also prompts further inquiries that extend beyond its epistemological scope. To address these broader questions, I propose a threefold approach that combines a critical perspective, a Foucauldian methodology, and social constructionism. By incorporating these complementary lenses, researchers can more effectively explore the intricate relationship between participant meaning and power imbalances within society. Additionally, this approach allows for an examination of how specific ways of being and doing become privileged as truth, while alternative perspectives and experiences are marginalised or excluded. The article serves as a theoretical foundation for understanding social constructionism, critical psychology, and Foucauldian methodology. It offers readers a comprehensive guide and a set of reflective tools to enhance their qualitative research practices. By considering the complexities of social legitimacy, critique, power imbalances, and the construction of truth, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the phenomena they investigate. Ultimately, this multifaceted approach contributes to a more nuanced and insightful analysis of social phenomena and facilitates a more inclusive exploration of diverse perspectives and versions of reality.

Funder

Curtin University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3