The role of textbook quality in first graders’ ability to solve quantitative comparisons: a multilevel analysis

Author:

Sievert HenningORCID,van den Ham Ann-Katrin,Heinze Aiso

Abstract

AbstractStudents need to create mental models for different types of addition and subtraction situations in order to develop a broad and viable understanding of these operations. Although most students succeed when changing or combining sets, situations that demand a quantitative comparison of sets seem considerably more difficult in the first school year. Textbooks represent the most important learning resource for elementary school mathematics teachers. However, research on their impact on students’ knowledge is limited. Hence, we examined textbooks’ role in students’ ability to model quantitative comparisons by analyzing the learning opportunities presented by four German textbooks for Grade 1 and by conducting a secondary analysis of a dataset based on 1513 students from 84 classes that used one of these textbooks. The results revealed differences in the textbooks’ topic-specific instructional quality as well as a significant relation between this quality and student achievement in quantitative comparisons.

Funder

IPN – Leibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik an der Universität Kiel

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Mathematics,Education

Reference57 articles.

1. Agodini, R., Harris, B., Thomas, M., Murphy, R., & Gallagher, L. (2010). Achievement effects of four early elementary school math curricula: Findings for first and second graders. NCEE 2011–4001. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

2. Bauer, R., & Maurach, J. (2011). Einstern 1. Cornelsen.

3. Bhatt, R., & Koedel, C. (2012). Large-scale evaluations of curricular effectiveness: the case of elementary mathematics in Indiana. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(4), 391–412

4. Bhatt, R., Koedel, C., & Lehmann, D. (2013). Is curriculum quality uniform? evidence from Florida. Economics of Education Review, 34, 107–121

5. Blazar, D., Heller, B., Kane, T., Polikoff, M., Staiger, D., Carrell, S., & Kurlaender, M. (2019). Learning by the book: Comparing math achievement growth by textbook in six Common Core states. Research report. Cambridge, MA: Center for Education Policy Research, Harvard University.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3