“Poison to the Economy”: (Un-)Taxing the Wealthy in the German Federal Parliament from 1996 to 2016

Author:

Hilmar TillORCID,Sachweh PatrickORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe concentration of wealth is a key component of the rise in economic inequality at the beginning of the twenty-first century. While the abolition of taxes on private wealth during the 1990s and 2000s is recognized as an important institutional driver behind this development, comparatively little is known about the justification of tax cuts for the wealthy in advanced democracies. This paper investigates how the abolishment of the personal net wealth tax in Germany, a country with high levels of wealth inequality, has been debated and justified in parliament over a period of 20 years. Using a mixed methods approach that combines computational social science methods and a qualitative analysis, we examine how Germany’s two major parties, the Christian Democrats (CDU) and the Social Democrats (SPD), have variously construed the meaning and purpose of the wealth tax and justified their support for or opposition to it. While the Social Democrats debate the wealth tax primarily from a social justice perspective, the Christian Democrats rely on an efficiency frame that invokes biological metaphors, enabling them to narrate the wealth tax as a threat to the social body. Paradoxically, then, by arguing that the tax is “poison to the economy”, conservative discourse succeeds in linking opposition to the wealth tax to a principle of social unity. On these grounds, we suggest that future research should scrutinize how the interrelation between political discourse and institutional architectures has facilitated the rise of wealth inequality in recent decades.

Funder

Universität Bremen

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science,Anthropology

Reference66 articles.

1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2008). Persistence of power, elites, and institutions. American Economic Review, 98(1), 267–293. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.1.267

2. Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2017). World inequality report. https://wir2018.wid.world/files/download/wir2018-full-report-english.pdf: World Inequality Lab.

3. Bach, S. (2016). Unsere Steuern. Wer zahlt? Wie viel? Wofür? Westend.

4. Bach, S., & Buggeln, M. (2020). Geburtsstunde des modernen Steuerstaats in Deutschland 1919/1920. Wirtschaftsdienst, 100(1), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-020-2559-9

5. Bach, S., & Thiemann, A. (2016). Hohes Aufkommenspotenzial bei Wiedererhebung der Vermögensteuer. DIW-Wochenbericht, 4(2016), 79–89.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3