Abstract
AbstractTo review the literature on economic evaluations of public health interventions targeting prevention of mental health problems and suicide, to support evidence based societal resource allocation. A systematic review of economic evaluations within mental health and suicide prevention was conducted including studies published between January 2000 and November 2018. The studies were identified through Medline, PsychINFO, Web of Science, the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database and Health Technology Assessment. The quality of relevant studies and the transferability of their results were assessed using a criterion set out by the Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment. Nineteen studies of moderate to high quality were included in this review, which evaluated 18 interventions in mental health and four interventions in suicide prevention. Fourteen (63%) of all interventions were cost-effective based on the conclusions from original papers. None of the studies that evaluated suicide prevention was of high quality. The interventions largely focused on psychological interventions at school, the workplace and within elderly care as well as screening and brief interventions in primary care. Nine studies (around 50% of included articles) had a high potential for transferability to the Swedish context. Public health interventions aiming to improve mental health have a high potential to be economically beneficial to society, but high-quality evidence on the cost-effectiveness of suicide prevention is limited.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Pshychiatric Mental Health
Reference58 articles.
1. Ahern, S., Burke, L. A., McElroy, B., Corcoran, P., McMahon, E. M., Keeley, H., et al. (2018). A cost-effectiveness analysis of school-based suicide prevention programmes. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(10), 1295–1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-018-1120-5.
2. Anderson, R. (2010). Systematic reviews of economic evaluations: Utility or futility? Health Economics, 19(3), 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1486.
3. Anderson, R., Ukoumunne, O. C., Sayal, K., Phillips, R., Taylor, J. A., Spears, M., et al. (2014). Cost-effectiveness of classroom-based cognitive behaviour therapy in reducing symptoms of depression in adolescents: A trial-based analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55(12), 1390–1397. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12248.
4. Appendix. 7 Checklist for assessing the quality of trialbased health economic studies. (2018a). Assessment of methods in health care – a handbook (pp. b7:1-b7:4.): Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment.
5. Appendix. 8 Checklist for assessing the quality of of health economic modelling studies. (2018b). Assessment of methods in health care – a handbook (pp. b8:1-b8:4.): Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献