Author:
van Geloven Nan,Swanson Sonja A.,Ramspek Chava L.,Luijken Kim,van Diepen Merel,Morris Tim P.,Groenwold Rolf H. H.,van Houwelingen Hans C.,Putter Hein,le Cessie Saskia
Abstract
AbstractIn this paper we study approaches for dealing with treatment when developing a clinical prediction model. Analogous to the estimand framework recently proposed by the European Medicines Agency for clinical trials, we propose a ‘predictimand’ framework of different questions that may be of interest when predicting risk in relation to treatment started after baseline. We provide a formal definition of the estimands matching these questions, give examples of settings in which each is useful and discuss appropriate estimators including their assumptions. We illustrate the impact of the predictimand choice in a dataset of patients with end-stage kidney disease. We argue that clearly defining the estimand is equally important in prediction research as in causal inference.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Cited by
50 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献