Heterogeneity in strategies to maintain the teaching activities during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

Author:

Hipler Noam M.,Prazienka Philipp,Wiesmann Crispin,Dieterich Daniela C.,Link Alexander

Abstract

Abstract Introduction During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the training of medical students was severely disrupted. Government authorities imposed a second national lockdown, which lasted from December 2020 to May 2021, forcing medical schools to adapt their teaching strategies. Several surveys have assessed students’ perspectives, but there is limited data available to objectively assess and compare different strategies between medical faculties. The aim of this study was to evaluate the lecturer-based perspective to assess the impact on the theoretical and practical education of medical students before and during the second lockdown. Methods We developed a questionnaire focusing on theoretical and practical training during pandemic before and during the second lockdown. The questionnaire was sent by personal invitation in January 2021 to all responsible lecturers of gastroenterology and hepatology departments at university hospitals in Germany. Results The complete response rate was obtained from 52.5% (21/40) teaching centres representative of all regions in Germany. While the majority of respondents (62%) reported a limited impact of the lockdown on theoretical training, 90.5% reported a significant impact on practical training during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic response. Several centres adapted virtual or hybrid education early during the pandemic, bedside teaching was down to 38.1% (8/21), particularly for students in the early phase of education, suggesting a substantial long-term impact on students' skills. Conclusion Our questionnaire-based data provide one of the first systematic evaluation of faculty-based assessments of the potential impact of the pandemic during lockdown on medical education. We observed considerable heterogeneity in strategies for maintaining teaching activities during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Germany.

Funder

Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3