Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Readiness assurance testing has enjoyed increased use as a tool for the delivery and reinforcement of pharmacy concepts. This study was conducted to determine the influence of the readiness assurance test (RAT) on major examination outcomes in pharmacy calculations.
Methods
The Blackboard Learning Management System was identified as an efficient platform for RAT implementation. The outcomes of three consecutive offerings of pharmacy calculations were compared. Cohorts 1 and 2 were exposed to recitation and standard assessments in lecture and laboratory sessions. Cohort 3 was additionally administered weekly individual (IRAT) and team (TRAT) readiness assurance tests for concept areas. All cohorts were exposed to a common comprehensive final exam.
Results
Significant differences were observed in major lecture exam scores among cohorts. Cohort 3’s mean final exam score was significantly greater than that of Cohort 1, which received the most conventional method of subject delivery. Students feedback was generally positive regarding use of RAT.
Conclusions
Use of RAT assessment was positively associated with final exam score outcomes in pharmacy calculations, including a positive shift in final exam score distribution in Cohort 3. Use of RAT promotes increased student exposure to conceptual material and instruction in pharmacy calculations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference28 articles.
1. Silberman D, Carpenter R, Takemoto JK, Coyne L. The impact of team-based learning on the critical thinking skills of pharmacy students. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021;13(2):116–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.09.008.
2. Michaelsen LK, Knight AB, Fink LD. Team-based learning: a transformative use of small groups in college teaching. Centers for Teaching Excellence—Book Library. 2004;199. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ct2-library/199.
3. Kang HY, Kim HR. Impact of blended learning on learning outcomes in the public healthcare education course: a review of flipped classroom with team-based learning. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02508-y.
4. Carrasco GA, Behling KC, Lopez OJ. Evaluation of the role of incentive structure on student participation and performance in active learning strategies: a comparison of case-based and team-based learning. Med Teach. 2018;40(4):379–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1408899.
5. Burgess A, Matar E, Roberts C, Haq I, Wynter L, Singer J, Kalman E, Bleasel J. Scaffolding medical student knowledge and skills: team-based learning (TBL) and case-based learning (CBL). BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02638-3.