1. Robert Swierenga, “Clio and Computers: A Survey of Computerized Research in History,”Computers and the Humanities 5 (Sept. 1970), 1–22, cites most of the other articles done through 1969. See also Morton Rothstein, Samuel McSeveney, Philip Greven, Robert Zemsky, and Joel Silbey, “Quantification in American History: An Assessment,” in Herbert Bass, ed.,The State of American History (Chicago: Quadrangle, 1970), 298–329, and the introductory chapter to Edward Shorter,The Historian and the Computer: A Practical Guide (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1971).
2. David S. Landes and Charles Tilly, eds.,History as Social Science, The Behavorial and Social Sciences Survey (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1971), 67.
3. The pages of theHistorical Methods Newsletter remain a useful guide to what is going on in quantitative history. The Consortium is described in Jerome Clubb, “The Inter-University Consortium for Political Research: Progress and Prospects,”Historical Methods Newsletter 2 (June 1969), 1–5.
4. TheJournal of Interdisciplinary History, published at MIT, contains many examples of this kind of work. It began publication in 1969. Val R. Lorwin and Jacob M. Price,The Dimensions of the Past: Materials, Problems, and Opportunities for Quantitative Work in History (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1972), and Joel H. Silbey and Samuel T. McSeveney,Voters, Parties and Elections (Waltham, Mass.: Xerox College Publishing, 1971), are examples of such anthologies.
5. William O. Aydelotte, ed.,Dimensions of Quantitative Work in History (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972); Donald N. McCloskey, ed.,Essays on a Mature Economy: Britain After 1840 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971). The volume on legislative behavior is in process.