Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Postoperative wound complications are common in patients undergoing resection of lower extremity soft tissue tumors. Postoperative drainage therapy ensures adequate wound healing but may delay or complicate it. The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence of postoperative wound complications and delayed or prolonged drainage treatment and to propose a standardized definition and severity grading of complex postoperative courses.
Methods
A monocentric retrospective analysis of 80 patients who had undergone primary resection of lower extremity soft tissue tumors was performed. A new classification was developed, which takes into account postoperative drainage characteristics and wound complications. Based on this classification, risk factors and the prognostic value of daily drainage volumes were evaluated.
Results
According to this new definition, regular postoperative course grade 0 (no wound complication and timely drainage removal) occurred in 26 patients (32.5%), grade A (minor wound complications or delayed drainage removal) in 12 (15.0%), grade B (major wound complication or prolonged drainage therapy) in 31 (38.8%), and grade C (reoperation) in 11 (13.7%) patients. Tumor-specific characteristics, such as tumor size (p = 0.0004), proximal tumor location (p = 0.0484), and tumor depth (p = 0.0138) were identified as risk factors for complex postoperative courses (grades B and C). Drainage volume on postoperative day 4 was a suitable predictor for complex courses (cutoff of 70 ml/d).
Conclusion
The proposed definition incorporates wound complications and drainage management while also being clinically relevant and easy to apply. It may serve as a standardized endpoint for assessing the postoperative course after resection of lower extremity soft tissue tumors.
Funder
Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. von Mehren M, Kane JM, Agulnik M, Bui MM, Carr-Ascher J, Choy E et al (2022) Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 20(7):815–833
2. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, D. K., AWMF) (2022) S3-Leitlinie Adulte Weichgewebesarkome, langversion 1.1 [Available from: https://www.leitlinienprogrammonkologie.de/leitlinien/adulte-weichgewebesarkome/.
3. Gronchi A, Miah AB, Dei Tos AP, Abecassis N, Bajpai J, Bauer S et al (2021) Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO-EURACAN-GENTURIS Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 32(11):1348–1365
4. Moore J, Isler M, Barry J, Mottard S (2014) Major wound complication risk factors following soft tissue sarcoma resection, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of. Surg Oncol 40(12):1671–1676
5. Grainger MF, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM (2001) Wound complications following resection of adductor compartment tumours. Sarcoma 5(4):203–207