Abstract
Abstract
Background
Illicitly manufactured fentanyl and its analogs are a major driving force behind the ongoing opioid crisis. Cyclopropylfentanyl is a fentanyl analog associated with many overdose deaths, but limited knowledge is available about its pharmacology. In the present study, we developed a bioanalytical method for the determination of cyclopropylfentanyl and its main metabolite cyclopropylnorfentanyl and evaluated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships in rats.
Method
An ultra-high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for determination of cyclopropylfentanyl and cyclopropylnorfentanyl in rat plasma. Male Sprague–Dawley rats fitted with jugular catheters and temperature transponders received cyclopropylfentanyl (30, 100, and 300 μg/kg) or saline subcutaneously. Blood specimens were withdrawn over an 8-h time period, along with measurements of pharmacodynamic endpoints.
Results
The analytical method was validated, and both analytes exhibited a low limit of quantification (15 pg/mL). Cyclopropylfentanyl caused dose-related increases in hot plate latency (ED50 = 48 µg/kg) and catalepsy (ED50 = 87 µg/kg) and produced long-lasting hypothermia at the highest dose. Plasma cyclopropylfentanyl rose rapidly in a dose-related fashion, reaching maximal concentration (Cmax) after 15–28 min, whereas metabolite Cmax occurred later at 45–90 min. Cyclopropylfentanyl Cmax values were similar to concentrations measured in non-fatal intoxications in humans; however, differences in parent drug: metabolite ratio indicated possible interspecies variance in metabolism.
Conclusion
Our study shows that cyclopropylfentanyl produces typical opioid-like effects in male rats. Cyclopropylfentanyl displays much greater analgesic potency when compared to morphine, suggesting that cyclopropylfentanyl poses increased overdose risk for unsuspecting users.
Funder
Intramural Research Program of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health
University of Oslo
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference61 articles.
1. AAFS (American Academy of Forensic Sciences) (2019) Academy Standards Board (ASB), ANSI/ASB Standard 036, Standard practices for method validation in forensic toxicology, First Edition. http://www.asbstandardsboard.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/036_Std_e1.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb 2020
2. Adamowicz P et al (2020) Screening procedure for 38 fentanyl analogues and five other new opioids in whole blood by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Appl Toxicol 40:1033–1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.3962
3. Armenian P et al (2018) Fentanyl, fentanyl analogs and novel synthetic opioids: a comprehensive review. Neuropharmacology 134:121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.10.016
4. Åstrand A et al (2018) Correlations between metabolism and structural elements of the alicyclic fentanyl analogs cyclopropyl fentanyl, cyclobutyl fentanyl, cyclopentyl fentanyl, cyclohexyl fentanyl and 2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropyl fentanyl studied by human hepatocytes and LC-QTOF-MS. Arch Toxicol 93:95–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-018-2330-9
5. Åstrand A et al (2020a) In vitro characterization of new psychoactive substances at the μ-opioid, CB1, 5HT1A, and 5-HT2A receptors—on-target receptor potency and efficacy, and off-target effects. Forensic Sci Int 317:110553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110553
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献