Abstract
Abstract
Background
The use of 3D technique compared to high-resolution 2D-4K-display technique has been shown to optimize spatial orientation and surgical performance in laparoscopic surgery. Since women make up an increasing amount of medical students and surgeons, this study was designed to investigate whether one gender has a greater benefit from using a 3D compared to a 4K-display system.
Methods
In a randomized cross-over trial, the surgical performance of male and female medical students (MS), non-board certified surgeons (NBCS), and board certified surgeons (BCS) was compared using 3D- vs. 4K-display technique at a minimally invasive training parkour with multiple surgical tasks and repetitions.
Results
128 participants (56 women, 72 men) were included. Overall parkour time in seconds was 3D vs. 4K for all women 770.7 ± 31.9 vs. 1068.1 ± 50.0 (p < 0.001) and all men 664.5 ± 19.9 vs. 889.7 ± 31.2 (p < 0.001). Regarding overall mistakes, participants tend to commit less mistakes while using the 3D-vision system, showing 10.2 ± 1.1 vs. 13.3 ± 1.3 (p = 0.005) for all women and 9.6 ± 0.7 vs. 12.2 ± 1.0 (p = 0.001) for all men. The benefit of using a 3D system, measured by the difference in seconds, was for women 297.3 ± 41.8 (27.84%) vs. 225.2 ± 23.3 (25.31%) for men (p = 0.005). This can be confirmed in the MS group with 327.6 ± 65.5 (35.82%) vs. 249.8 ± 33.7 (32.12%), p = 0.041 and in the NBCS group 359 ± 52.4 (28.25%) vs. 198.2 ± 54.2 (18.62%), p = 0.003. There was no significant difference in the BCS group.
Conclusion
3D laparoscopic display technique optimizes surgical performance compared to the 2D-4K technique for both women and men. The greatest 3D benefit was found for women with less surgical experience. As a possible result of surgical education, this gender specific difference disappears with higher grade of experience. Using a 3D-vision system could facilitate surgical apprenticeship, especially for women.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference52 articles.
1. McManus IC, Sproston KA (2000) Women in hospital medicine in the United Kingdom: glass ceiling, preference, prejudice or cohort effect? J Epidemiol Community Health 54(1):10–16. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.54.1.10
2. Sexton KW, Hocking KM, Wise E et al (2012) Women in academic surgery: the pipeline is busted. J Surg Educ 69(1):84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.07.008
3. Statisches Bundesamt: Anzahl der Studierenden im Fach Humanmedizin in Deutschland nach Geschlecht in den Wintersemestern. https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/200758/umfrage/entwicklung-der-anzahl-der-medizinstudenten/. Accessed 25 May 2021
4. Carter JV, Polk HC, Galbraith NJ et al (2018) Women in surgery: a longer term follow-up. Am J Surg 216(2):189–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.05.002
5. Troppmann KM, Palis BE, Goodnight JE, Ho HS, Troppmann C (2009) Women surgeons in the new millennium. Arch Surg 144(7):635–641. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2009.120
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献