Abstract
AbstractBorehole leakage is a common and complex issue. Understanding the fluid flow characteristics of a cemented area inside a borehole is crucial to monitor and quantify the wellbore integrity as well as to find solutions to minimise existing leakages. In order to improve our understanding of the flow behaviour of cemented boreholes, we investigated experimental data of a large-scale borehole leakage tests by means of numerical modelling using three different conceptual models. The experiment was performed with an autoclave system consisting of two vessels bridged by a cement-filled casing. After a partial bleed-off at the well-head, a sustained casing pressure was observed due to fluid flow through the cement–steel composite. The aim of our simulations is to investigate and quantify the permeability of the cement–steel composite. From our model results, we conclude that the flow occurred along a preferential flow path at the cement–steel interface. Thus, the inner part of the cement core was impermeable during the duration of the experiment. The preferential flow path can be described as a highly permeable and highly porous area with an aperture of about $$5\,\upmu \mathrm{m}$$
5
μ
m
and a permeability of $$3 \cdot 10^{-12}\,\mathrm{m}^{2}$$
3
·
10
-
12
m
2
(3 Darcy). It follows that the fluid flow characteristics of a cemented area inside a borehole cannot be described using one permeability value for the entire cement–steel composite. Furthermore, it can be concluded that the quality of the cement and the filling process regarding the cement–steel interface is crucial to minimize possible well leakages.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Universität Potsdam
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Chemical Engineering,Catalysis
Reference43 articles.
1. API RP90: Annular Casing Pressure Management for Offshores Wells. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC (2006)
2. Bly, M.: Deepwater Horizon Accident Investigation Report. DIANE Publishing, Darby (2011)
3. Bourgoyne, A., Scott, S., Manowski, W.: A review of sustained casing pressure occurring on the OCS. In: Offshore Technology Conference (2000)
4. Carey, J.W., Wigand, M., Chipera, S.J., WoldeGabriel, G., Pawar, R., Lichtner, P.C., Wehner, S.C., Raines, M.A., Guthrie Jr., G.D.: Analysis and performance of oil well cement with 30 years of $${\text{ CO}_{2}}$$ exposure from the SACROC Unit, West Texas, USA. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 1(1), 75–85 (2007)
5. Celia, M.A., Bachu, S.: Geological sequestration of $${\text{ CO}_{2}}$$: is leakage unavoidable and acceptable? In: Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies—6th International Conference, pp. 477–482. Elsevier (2003)
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献