Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Mathematics
Reference41 articles.
1. Akar, G. (2010). Different levels of reasoning in within state ratio conception and the conceptualisation of rate: A possible example. In P. Brosnan, D. B. Erchick, & L.Flevares (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 711–719). Columbus, OH: The University of Ohio.
2. Baysal, E., & Sevinc, S. (2022). The role of the Singapore bar model in reducing students’ errors on algebra word problems. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(2), 289-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1944683
3. Beckmann, S., & Izsák, A. (2015). Two perspectives on proportional relationships: Extending complementary origins of multiplication in terms of quantities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.1.0017
4. Beckmann, S., & Kulow, T. K. (2018). How future teachers reasoned with variable parts and strip diagrams to develop equations for proportional relationships and lines. In Y. Li (Ed.), Mathematics Matters in Education (pp. 117–148). Springer.
5. Brown, R. E., Orrill, C. H. & Park, J. (2020). Exploring differences in practicing teachers’ knowledge use in a dynamic and static proportional task. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00350-x