Abstract
AbstractAll reservoirs are fractured to some degree. Depending on the density, dimension, orientation and the cementation of natural fractures and the location where the hydraulic fracturing is done, preexisting natural fractures can impact hydraulic fracture propagation and the associated flow capacity. Understanding the interactions between hydraulic fracture and natural fractures is crucial in estimating fracture complexity, stimulated reservoir volume, drained reservoir volume and completion efficiency. However, because of the presence of natural fractures with diffuse penetration and different orientations, the operation is complicated in naturally fractured gas reservoirs. For this purpose, two numerical methods are proposed for simulating the hydraulic fracture in a naturally fractured gas reservoir. However, what hydraulic fracture looks like in the subsurface, especially in unconventional reservoirs, remain elusive, and many times, field observations contradict our common beliefs. In this study, the hydraulic fracture model is considered in terms of the state of tensions, on the interaction between the hydraulic fracture and the natural fracture (45°), and the effect of length and height of hydraulic fracture developed and how to distribute induced stress around the well. In order to determine the direction in which the hydraulic fracture is formed strikethrough, the finite difference method and the individual element for numerical solution are used and simulated. The results indicate that the optimum hydraulic fracture time was when the hydraulic fracture is able to connect natural fractures with large streams and connected to the well, and there is a fundamental difference between the tensile and shear opening. The analysis indicates that the growing hydraulic fracture, the tensile and shear stresses applied to the natural fracture.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Energy,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Reference36 articles.
1. Bennion D, Thomas F, Bietz R (1996) Low permeability gas reservoirs: problems, opportunities and solutions for drilling, completion, stimulation and production. In: SPE gas technology symposium, 35577. https://doi.org/10.2118/35577-MS
2. Benson PM (2004) Experimental study of void space, permeability and elastic anisotropy in crustal rocks under ambient and hydrostatic pressure. Ph.D. Thesis, University College London. Preprint at. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1446540
3. Benson PM, Vinciguerra S, Meredith PG, Young RP (2010) Spatio-temporal evolution of coupled hydro-mechanical seismicity: a laboratory study. Earth Planet Sci Lett 297:315–323
4. Bernier F et al (2007) Fractures and self-healing within the excavation disturbed zone in clays (SELFRAC). Final report to European Commission (Project FIKW-CT2001-00182) Preprint at. www.euridice.be/sites/default/files/scientific/SELFRAC%20final%20report.pdf. Accessed 2007
5. David CJ et al (2018) KG2B, a collaborative benchmarking exercise for estimating the permeability of the Grimsel granodiorite—part 1: measurements, pressure dependence and pore fluid effects. Geophys J Int 215:799–824
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献