Author:
Wangler Julian,Jansky Michael
Abstract
Abstract
Aim
Increasingly at GP practices, patients appear who are extremely worried as a result of health information researched online and consequently affected by doubts and concerns. The study highlights GP attitudes and experiences with regard to this patient group. Moreover, it identifies strategies adopted by GPs to respond appropriately to worried or scared patients.
Subject and methods
In the German federal states of Baden-Württemberg, Rhineland-Palatinate and Saarland, 2532 GPs were surveyed between June and August 2022. Owing to the explorative nature of the study, a descriptive analysis was conducted.
Results
Of the total respondents, 77% deemed the current problem of internet-related health concerns to be a major challenge in everyday practice. The implications affect patients’ mental stability and expectations towards the doctor (esp. demand for further instrumental diagnosis, 83%). One doctor in five (20%) has experienced the termination of patient contact because the relationship with the patient was no longer possible due to the patient’s uncontrolled online information behaviour. To respond to worried or scared patients, the respondents generally ask certain patient groups about online research (39%) and take this into account in the doctor–patient discussion (23%). Furthermore, the respondents use a detailed explanation of the diagnosis and/or treatment (65%) and recommend websites that they consider reputable (66%). Some of the doctors prefer a joint examination of the information researched by the patient (55%) as well as to explain the benefits and risks of online research (43%).
Conclusion
Many GPs demonstrate a high level of awareness and sensitivity with regard to extensive online research and potentially worried patients. It seems advisable to actively address the online search for information in the patient consultation to prevent possible negative effects on the doctor–patient relationship and to actively involve the patient. In this respect, it would also be worth considering expanding the medical history to include the dimension of online searching.
Funder
Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference24 articles.
1. Ahluwalia S, Murray E, Stevenson F et al (2010) 'A heartbeat moment': Qualitative study of GP views of patients bringing health information from the internet to a consultation. Br J Gen Pract 60:88–94. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp10X483120
2. Baumgart J (2010) Ärzte und informierte Patienten: Ambivalentes Verhältnis [English: Doctors and in-formed patients: Ambivalent relationship]. Dtsch Arztebl 107:A2554–A2556
3. Bittner A (2016) Erfahrungen, Einstellungen und Umgang von Ärzten mit informierten Patienten [English: Experiences, attitudes and treatment of physicians with informed patients]. In: Böcken J, Braun B, Meierjürgen R (eds) Gesundheitsmonitor 2016. Bürgerorientierung im Gesundheitswesen [English: Health Monitor 2016. Citizen orientation in healthcare]. Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh, pp 141–159
4. Dumitru RC, Bürkle T, Potapov S et al (2007) Use and perception of internet for health related purposes in Germany: Results of a national survey. Int J Public Health 52:275–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-007-6067-0
5. Eastin MS, Guinsler NM (2006) Worried and wired: Effects of health anxiety on information-seeking and health care utilization behaviors. Cyberpsychol Behav 9:494–498. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.494
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献