Author:
Muttilainen Hanna,Hallikainen Ville,Miina Jari,Vornanen Juha,Vanhanen Henri
Abstract
AbstractGlobal trends towards the bioeconomy and multidimensional ecosystem-based approaches are transforming our understanding of forests and expanding access to forest management. The demand for non-timber forest products (NTFPs) is increasing due to the current trends in lifestyle and consumption. Forest owners play a key role in the supply of NTFPs. However, many forest owners are not committed to production or aware of the opportunities for production of their forests. Understanding better the family forest owners’ behaviour and decision making regarding NTFPs is needed to strengthen the role of NTFPs in the Finnish bioeconomy. In this study, forest owners’ perspectives concerning NTFPs, Everyman’s Rights, and organic certification of forests were identified. The survey data were collected by emailing the questionnaire to North Karelian forest owners and analysed by creating forest owner typologies based on their forest ownership motives and perspectives concerning NTFPs. Regarding forest ownership motives, four owner groups of relatively equal size were identified and named as recreationist, conservationists, timber producers, and resigning owners leaving the forest property to the next generation. Regarding their use of NTFPs and interest in producing NTFPs four groups of owners were identified: owners who 1) harvested NTFPs for household use or 2) sale, 3) would allow the harvesting of NTFPs not covered by everyman’s right, and 4) need more information on the joint production of timber and NTFPs not covered by Everyman’s Rights. Most owners were household users. The results can be utilised to promote NTFP production and advocate for the more effective organic certification of forests for different forest owner groups.
Funder
the European Regional Development Fund
Natural Resources Institute Finland
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference67 articles.
1. Amos C, Pentina I, Hawkins TG, Davis N (2014) Natural labeling and consumers sentimental pastoral notion. J Prod Brand Manag 23:268–281. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-03-2014-0516
2. Apaolaza V, Hartmann P, Echebarria C, Barrutia JM (2017) Organic label’s halo effect on sensory and hedonic experience of wine: a pilot study. J Sens Stud 32:e12243. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12243
3. Arktiset Aromit (2020) Suomi on yhä luomukeruun ykkönen. https://www.arktisetaromit.fi/sitenews/view/-/nid/498/ngid/1/language_code/fi/. (In Finnish).
4. Boon TE, Meilby H, Thorsen BJ (2004) An empirically based typology of private forest owners in Denmark: improving communication between authorities and owners. Scand J for Res 19(Suppl. 4):45–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/14004080410034056
5. Burrows J, Sanness B (1998) The competitive climate for wood products and paper packaging. The factors causing substitution with emphasis on environmental promotions. Joint FAO/ECE Team of Public Relations Specialists in the Forest and Forest Industries Sector. Living Forests, Oslo.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献