A selectionist explanation for the success and failures of science-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

A selectionist explanation for the success and failures of science

Published:2007-04-20 Issue:1 Volume:67 Page:81-89
ISSN:0165-0106
Container-title:Erkenntnis
language:en
Short-container-title:Erkenntnis

Author:

Brad Wray K.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Logic,Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10670-007-9046-1.pdf

Reference20 articles.

1. Barnes, B., & Bloor, D. (1982). Relativism, rationalism and the sociology of knowledge. In M. Hollis & S. Lukes (Eds.), Rationality and relativism (pp. 21–47). Cambridge: MIT Press.

2. Brown, J. R. (1985). Explaining the success of science. Ratio, XXVII(1), 49–66.

3. Carrier, M. (1991). What is wrong with the miracle argument? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 22(1), 23–36.

4. Darwin, C. ([1859]/2003). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, edited by J. Carroll. Peterborough: Broadview Press, Ltd.

5. Gingerich, O. (1975). “Crisis” versus aesthetic in the Copernican revolution. Vistas in Astronomy, 17, 85–95.

Cited by 31 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Running Mice and Successful Theories: The Limitations of a Classical Analogy;Journal for General Philosophy of Science;2023-12-27

2. Grounding the Selectionist Explanation for the Success of Science in the External Physical World;Foundations of Science;2023-03-13

3. Methodological Naturalism and Scientific Success;European Journal for Philosophy of Religion;2022-02-28

4. WHAT IS NATURAL THEOLOGY? (AND SHOULD WE DISPENSE WITH IT?);Zygon®;2022-01-20

5. In Defense of the No-Miracles Argument;Embracing Scientific Realism;2021-12-03