Abstract
AbstractI identify two versions of the scientific anti-realist’s selectionist explanation for the success of science: Bas van Fraassen’s original and K. Brad Wray’s newer interpretation. In Wray’s version, psycho-social factors internal to the scientific community – viz. scientists’ interests, goals, and preferences – explain the theory-selection practices that explain theory-success. I argue that, if Wray’s version were correct, then science should resemble art. In art, the artwork-selection practices that explain artwork-success appear faddish. They are prone to radical change over time. Theory-selection practices that explain theory-success in science are however not faddish. They are mostly stable; that is, long-lived and consistent over time. This is because scientists (explicitly or implicitly) subscribe to what I will call the testability norm: scientific theories must make falsifiable claims about the external physical world. The testability norm and not psycho-sociology explains the theory-selection practices that explain theory-success in science. Contra Wray, scientific anti-realists can then maintain that the external physical world (as expressed in the testability norm) explains theory-success.
Funder
John Templeton Foundation
University of Johannesburg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Multidisciplinary
Reference85 articles.
1. Ambrosio, C. (2021). Feyerabend on art and science. In K. Bschir, & J. Shaw (Eds.), Interpreting Feyerabend: critical essays (pp. 11–39). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Ben-David, J. (1971). The scientist’s role in society. Englewood: Prentice-Hall.
3. Bernal, J. D. (1971). Science in history, 3rd edition. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
4. Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge.
5. Bloor, D., Barnes, B., & Henry, J. (1996). Scientific knowledge: a sociological analysis. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献