Abstract
AbstractAnthropomorphism is the methodology of attributing human-like mental states to animals. Zoomorphism is the converse of this: it is the attribution of animal-like mental states to humans. Zoomorphism proceeds by first understanding what kind of mental states animals have and then attributing these mental states to humans. Zoomorphism has been widely used as scientific methodology especially in cognitive neuroscience. But it has not been taken seriously as a philosophical explanatory paradigm: as a way of explaining the building blocks of the human mind. The philosophical explanatory paradigm of zoomorphism may not explain all aspects of human behavior (although it may explain surprisingly many), but if we accept the zoomorphic way of thinking about the human mind, we should only posit new, different kinds of mental states if the zoomorphic attribution of animal mental states fails to explain our behavior.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference85 articles.
1. Allen, C. (2004). Is anyone a cognitive ethologist? Biology and Philosophy, 19, 589–607.
2. Allen, C., & Bekoff, M. (1997). Species of mind: The philosophy and biology of cognitive ethology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
3. Andrews, K. (2015). The Animal Mind: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Animal Cognition. New York: Routledge.
4. Bach, K. (1978). A representational theory of action. Philosophical Studies, 34, 361–379.
5. Blumberg, M. S., & Wasserman, E. A. (1995). Animal mind and the argument from design. American Psycholigist, 50, 133–144.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献