International teaching internships for future teachers: potential and challenges for learning

Author:

Mantel CarolaORCID,Kamm Esther,Bieri Buschor Christine

Abstract

AbstractInternationalisation of the higher education system continues to have a strong impact on national education policies. From an international perspective, learning to teach in globally competent and culturally responsive ways is a core element of teacher education. For this purpose, academically and practice-oriented student teacher exchange programmes have been established. It is often taken for granted that corresponding internships abroad offer positive learning experiences, but research shows that these expectations are frequently not met. This paper; therefore, investigates if and how learning takes place in multi-week international internships, what shapes, enables, limits or obstructs this learning. The investigation is based on a qualitative-hermeneutic approach with data collected from group discussions and analysed according to the documentary method. The analyses led to two ‘ideal types’: the first is based on learning from contrasts and includes sub-types in which the student teachers’ perceptions and interpretations are differentiated or distanced to a greater or lesser extent. The second ideal type, in which learning takes place through challenges, is also divided into sub-types which differ in the degree of self-efficacy experienced by the students. The paper concludes with some suggestions on how pre-service teachers can be supported so that the learning potential of their internships can be exploited more fully.

Funder

University of Teacher Education Zug

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Education

Reference28 articles.

1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.

2. Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2006). Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften (Keyword: Professional competence of teachers). Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft (journal of Educational Science), 9(4), 469–520.

3. Bohnsack, R. (2001). Typenbildung, Generalisierung und komparative Analyse: Grundprinzipien der dokumentarischen Methode (Type formation, generalization and comparative analysis: Basic principles of the documentary method). In R. Bohnsack, I. Nentwig-Gesemann, & A.-M. Nohl (Eds.), Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis (The documentary method and its application in research) (pp. 225–252). Leske, Budrich.

4. Bohnsack, R. (2008). Rekonstruktive Sozialforschung. Einführung in qualitative Methoden (Reconstructive social research. Introduction to qualitative methods). Budrich.

5. Bohnsack, R. (2010). Documentary method and group discussions. In R. Bohnsack, N. Pfaff, & W. Weller (Eds.), Qualitative analysis and documentary method in international education research (pp. 99–124). Barbara Budrich Publishers.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3