Abstract
AbstractInternationalisation of the higher education system continues to have a strong impact on national education policies. From an international perspective, learning to teach in globally competent and culturally responsive ways is a core element of teacher education. For this purpose, academically and practice-oriented student teacher exchange programmes have been established. It is often taken for granted that corresponding internships abroad offer positive learning experiences, but research shows that these expectations are frequently not met. This paper; therefore, investigates if and how learning takes place in multi-week international internships, what shapes, enables, limits or obstructs this learning. The investigation is based on a qualitative-hermeneutic approach with data collected from group discussions and analysed according to the documentary method. The analyses led to two ‘ideal types’: the first is based on learning from contrasts and includes sub-types in which the student teachers’ perceptions and interpretations are differentiated or distanced to a greater or lesser extent. The second ideal type, in which learning takes place through challenges, is also divided into sub-types which differ in the degree of self-efficacy experienced by the students. The paper concludes with some suggestions on how pre-service teachers can be supported so that the learning potential of their internships can be exploited more fully.
Funder
University of Teacher Education Zug
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Education
Reference28 articles.
1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
2. Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2006). Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften (Keyword: Professional competence of teachers). Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft (journal of Educational Science), 9(4), 469–520.
3. Bohnsack, R. (2001). Typenbildung, Generalisierung und komparative Analyse: Grundprinzipien der dokumentarischen Methode (Type formation, generalization and comparative analysis: Basic principles of the documentary method). In R. Bohnsack, I. Nentwig-Gesemann, & A.-M. Nohl (Eds.), Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis (The documentary method and its application in research) (pp. 225–252). Leske, Budrich.
4. Bohnsack, R. (2008). Rekonstruktive Sozialforschung. Einführung in qualitative Methoden (Reconstructive social research. Introduction to qualitative methods). Budrich.
5. Bohnsack, R. (2010). Documentary method and group discussions. In R. Bohnsack, N. Pfaff, & W. Weller (Eds.), Qualitative analysis and documentary method in international education research (pp. 99–124). Barbara Budrich Publishers.