Abstract
AbstractA critical aspect of designing and running online study programs is the identification of factors and elements that could potentially threaten the continuation of studies. In this study, we first identified a set of critical events that occurred in the running of a Finnish online doctoral study program over 16 years. Next, we analyzed the events using a four-pillar sustainability model, which consisted of the economic, social, environmental, and ethical pillars. We detected several contextually relevant and dynamic pivotal factors related to each of the pillars, which had effects on the sustainability of the program at the time of the critical events. The analysis revealed that positive pivotal factors in one sustainability pillar can be used to compensate for negative pivotal factors in the other pillars. Two aspects that were crucial for the sustainability of the online doctoral study program were the resilience and shared commitment of the community involved in its activities, which helped in overcoming any challenges encountered. Based on this study, we recommended that future research should design novel solutions that help online study programs to proactively identify potential critical events and related pivotal factors. Furthermore, studies should find creative approaches for constructively coping with critical events that have been identified.
Funder
University of Eastern Finland (UEF) including Kuopio University Hospital
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference56 articles.
1. Apiola, M., Munishi, E., Nangawe, A., Suhonen, J., & Sutinen, E. (2020). Building the innovation ecosystem in Tanzania: Four viewpoints to technology business incubation. Proceedings of the 2016 international conference on engineering, technology and innovation/IEEE international technology management conference (ICE/ITMC). IEEE
2. Apiola, M., Suhonen, J., Nangawe, A., & Sutinen, E. (2015). Building CS research capacity in sub-Saharan Africa by implementing a doctoral training program. Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical symposium on computer science education (SIGCSE) (pp. 633–638). ACM Press
3. Avison, D., Lau, F., Myers, M., & Nielsen, P. A. (1999). Action research. Communications of the ACM, 42(1), 94–97
4. Barberà, E., Gómez-Rey, P., & Fernández-Navarro, F. (2016). A cross-national study of teacher’s perceptions of online learning success. Open Learning: The Journal of Open Distance and e-Learning, 31(1), 25–41
5. Baskerville, R. L. (1999). Investigating information systems with action research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 2(1), 19.