Academic capture in the Anthropocene: a framework to assess climate action in higher education

Author:

Lachapelle PaulORCID,Belmont Patrick,Grasso Marco,McCann Roslynn,Gouge Dawn H.,Husch Jerri,de Boer Cheryl,Molzbichler Daniela,Klain Sarah

Abstract

AbstractHigher education institutions have a mandate to serve the public good, yet in many cases fail to adequately respond to the global climate crisis. The inability of academic institutions to commit to purposeful climate action through targeted research, education, outreach, and policy is due in large part to “capture” by special interests. Capture involves powerful minority interests that exert influence and derive benefits at the expense of a larger group or purpose. This paper makes a conceptual contribution to advance a framework of “academic capture” applied to the climate crisis in higher education institutions. Academic capture is the result of the three contributing factors of increasing financialization issues, influence of the fossil fuel industry, and reticence of university employees to challenge the status quo. The framework guides an empirical assessment evaluating eight activities and related indices of transparency and participation based on principles of climate justice and the growing democracy-climate nexus. The framework can be a helpful tool for citizens and academics to assess the potential for academic capture and capacity for more just and democratic methods of climate action in higher education. We conclude with a series of recommendations on how to refine and apply our framework and assessment in academic settings. Our goal is to further the discussion on academic capture and continue to develop tools that transform higher education institutions to places of deep democracy and innovative climate education, research, and outreach to meet the challenges of the Anthropocene.

Funder

Montana State University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference171 articles.

1. AccountAbility (2018) AA1000 Accountability principles. AccountAbility. https://www.accountability.org/standards/aa1000-accountability-principles/. Accessed 7 July 2023

2. Alexander B (2023) Universities on fire: higher education in the climate crisis. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

3. Allen M, Axelsson K, Caldecott B et al (2020) The Oxford principles for net zero aligned carbon offsetting. University of Oxford, Oxford https://www.smithschool.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2022-01/Oxford-Offsetting-Principles-2020.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2023

4. Allott N, Knight C, Smith N (2019) The responsibility of intellectuals: reflections by Noam Chomsky and others after 50 years. UCL Press, London. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781787355514

5. Almond D, Du X, Papp A (2022) Favourability towards natural gas relates to funding source of university energy centres. Nat Clim Chang 12:1122–1128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01521-3

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3