Fossil fuel industry influence in higher education: A review and a research agenda

Author:

Hiltner Sofia1ORCID,Eaton Emily2,Healy Noel3,Scerri Andrew4,Stephens Jennie C.5ORCID,Supran Geoffrey6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA

2. Department of Geography and Environmental Studies University of Regina Regina Canada

3. Geography and Sustainability Department Salem State University Salem Massachusetts USA

4. Political Science & International Studies Virginia Tech Blacksburg Virginia USA

5. ICARUS Climate Research Centre National University of Ireland Maynooth Ireland

6. Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Rosenstiel School of Marine, Atmospheric, and Earth Science University of Miami Coral Gables Florida USA

Abstract

AbstractThe evolution of fossil fuel industry tactics for obstructing climate action, from outright denial of climate change to more subtle techniques of delay, is under growing scrutiny. One key site of ongoing climate obstructionism identified by researchers, journalists, and advocates is higher education. Scholars have exhaustively documented how industry‐sponsored academic research tends to bias scholarship in favor of tobacco, pharmaceutical, food, sugar, lead, and other industries, but the contemporary influence of fossil fuel interests on higher education has received relatively little academic attention. We report the first literature review of academic and civil society investigations into fossil fuel industry ties to higher education in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia. We find that universities are an established yet under‐researched vehicle of climate obstruction by the fossil fuel industry, and that universities' lack of transparency about their partnerships with this industry poses a challenge to empirical research. We propose a research agenda of topical and methodological directions for future analyses of the prevalence and consequences of fossil fuel industry–university partnerships, and responses to them.This article is categorized under: Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Climate Science and Decision Making Climate, Nature, and Ethics > Ethics and Climate Change Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Sociology/Anthropology of Climate Knowledge Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Climate Science and Social Movements

Funder

High Tide Foundation

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Reference117 articles.

1. Achakulwisut P. Scandella B. Supran G. &Voss B.(2016).Ending ExxonMobil sponsorship of the American Geophysical Union—How ExxonMobil's past and present climate misinformation violates the AGU's organizational support policy and scientific integrity.https://perma.cc/PBN7-V59J

2. Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies

3. Favourability towards natural gas relates to funding source of university energy centres

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3