Learning tractable probabilistic models for moral responsibility and blame

Author:

Hammond LewisORCID,Belle VaishakORCID

Abstract

AbstractMoral responsibility is a major concern in autonomous systems, with applications ranging from self-driving cars to kidney exchanges. Although there have been recent attempts to formalise responsibility and blame, among similar notions, the problem of learning within these formalisms has been unaddressed. From the viewpoint of such systems, the urgent questions are: (a) How can models of moral scenarios and blameworthiness be extracted and learnt automatically from data? (b) How can judgements be computed effectively and efficiently, given the split-second decision points faced by some systems? By building on constrained tractable probabilistic learning, we propose and implement a hybrid (between data-driven and rule-based methods) learning framework for inducing models of such scenarios automatically from data and reasoning tractably from them. We report on experiments that compare our system with human judgement in three illustrative domains: lung cancer staging, teamwork management, and trolley problems.

Funder

Royal Society

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems

Reference62 articles.

1. Abel D, MacGlashan J, Littman ML (2016) Reinforcement learning as a framework for ethical decision making. In: Workshops at the 30th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence

2. Acharya J, Bhattacharyya A, Constantinos D, Saravanan K (2018) Learning and testing causal models with interventions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.09697

3. Allen C, Smit I, Wallach W (2005) Artificial morality: top–down, bottom–up, and hybrid approaches. Ethics Inf Technol 7(3):149–155

4. Anderson M, Anderson SL (2014) Geneth: a general ethical dilemma analyzer. In: Proceedings of the 28th AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, pp 253–261

5. Arkin RC, Ulam PD, Duncan B (2009) An ethical governor for constraining lethal action in an autonomous system. Technical Report GIT-GVU-09-02, Georgia Institute of Technology Mobile Robot Lab

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Minimum levels of interpretability for artificial moral agents;AI and Ethics;2024-07-31

2. Chapter 5. Boolean Connectives and Deep Learning: Three Interpretations;Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications;2023-07-21

3. Knowledge representation and acquisition for ethical AI: challenges and opportunities;Ethics and Information Technology;2023-03

4. Tractable Probabilistic Models for Ethical AI;Graph-Based Representation and Reasoning;2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3