Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference24 articles.
1. Arenhart, J. R. B. (2021). The evidence approach to paraconsistency versus the paraconsistent approach to evidence. Synthese, 198, 11537–11559.
2. Arenhart, J. R. B., & Krause, D. (2019). Quasi-truth and defective knowledge in science: a critical examination. Retrieved April 05, 2020, from http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/16356/.
3. Barrio, E. (2018). Models & proofs: LFIs without a canonical interpretation. Principia an International Journal of Epistemology, 22(1), 87–112.
4. Barrio, E., & da Re, B. (2018). Paraconsistency and its philosophical interpretations. Australasian Journal of Logic, 15(2), 151–170.
5. Beall, J. C., & Ripley, D. (2004). Analetheism and dialetheism. Analysis, 64(281), 30–35.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献