Paraconsistency, Evidence and Semantic Incompleteness
-
Published:2024-05-07
Issue:1
Volume:44
Page:117-140
-
ISSN:1851-9636
-
Container-title:Análisis Filosófico
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Anál. Filos.
Abstract
In this paper, we argue that the systems Basic Logic of Evidence (BLE) and Logic of Evidence and Truth (LETJ) suffer a kind of semantic incompleteness with respect to the informal notion of evidence. More especifically, we argue that the connective o of the logic LETJ fails to validate intuitive principles about conclusive evidence.
Publisher
Sociedad Argentina de Analisis Filosofico