Statistical resentment, or: what’s wrong with acting, blaming, and believing on the basis of statistics alone-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Statistical resentment, or: what’s wrong with acting, blaming, and believing on the basis of statistics alone

Published:2021-02-05 Issue:3-4 Volume:199 Page:5687-5718
ISSN:0039-7857
Container-title:Synthese
language:en
Short-container-title:Synthese

Author:

Enoch David^ORCID,Spectre Levi^ORCID

Funder

Israel Science Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Social Sciences,Philosophy

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11229-021-03042-6.pdf

Reference68 articles.

1. Anderson, C., & John, H. (2018b). Knowledge, practical adequacy, and stakes. Oxford Studies in Epistemology, 5, 234.

2. Anderson, C., & John, H. (2018a). Pragmatic encroachment and closure. In B. Kim & M. McGrath (Eds.), Pragmatic encroachment in epistemology. Abingdon: Routledge.

3. Basu, R. (2019b). The wrongs of racist beliefs. Philosophical Studies, 176(9), 2497–2515.

4. Basu, R. (2019a). What we epistemically owe to each other. Philosophical Studies, 176(4), 915–931.

5. Basu, R., & Schroeder, M. (2019). Doxastic wronging. In B. Kim & M. McGrath (Eds.), Pragmatic encroachment in epistemology (pp. 181–205). Abingdon: Routledge.

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Just probabilities;Noûs;2023-12-19

2. What we owe to decision-subjects: beyond transparency and explanation in automated decision-making;Philosophical Studies;2023-08-17

3. Belief, blame, and inquiry: a defense of doxastic wronging;Philosophical Studies;2023-08-01

4. Algorithmic Decision-making, Statistical Evidence and the Rule of Law;Episteme;2023-05-29

5. What is rational belief?;Noûs;2023-03-19