Abstract
AbstractAn epistemic deontology modelled on Kant’s ethics—in particular the humanity formula of the categorical imperative—is a promising alternative to epistemic consequentialism because it can forbid intuitively impermissible epistemic trade-offs which epistemic consequentialism seems doomed to permit and, most importantly, it can do so in a way that is not ad hoc.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference55 articles.
1. Alexander, L. and M. Moore (2016). Deontological ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
2. Alston, W. P. (1988). The deontological conception of epistemic justification. Philosophical Perspectives, 2, 257–299.
3. Andow, J. (2017). Do non-philosophers think epistemic consequentialism is counterintuitive? Synthese, 194(7), 2631–2643.
4. Andow, J. (2017). Epistemic consequentialism, truth fairies and worse fairies. Philosophia, 45(3), 987–993.
5. Baron, M. (1988). What is wrong with self-deception? In B. P. McLaughlin & A. O. Rorty (Eds.), Perspectives on self-deception. University of California Press.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献