1. Ahlstrom-Vij, K., & Dunn, J. (2014). A defence of epistemic consequentialism. The Philosophical Quarterly, 64(257), 541–551. URL:
http://pq.oxfordjournals.org/content/64/257/541
. abstract.
2. Berker, S. (2013). The rejection of epistemic consequentialism. Philosophical Issues, 23(1), 363–387.
3. Briesen, J. (2016). Epistemic consequentialism: Its relation to ethical consequentialism and the truth-indication principle. In M. Grajner & P. Schmechtig (Eds.), Epistemic reasons, norms, and goals. de Guyter: Berlin/New-York.
4. Elstein, D. and Jenkins, C. I. (2017). The truth fairy and the indirect epistemic consequentialist. In N. J. L. L. Pedersen & P. Graham (Eds.), Epistemic entitlement. Oxford University Press. Final draft
https://www.carriejenkins.net/papers/
. Accessed 7 April 2017. (forthcoming)
5. Goldman, A. and Beddor, B. (2016). Reliabilist epistemology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition). URL:
https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/reliabilism/
. Accessed 7 April 2017.