Abstract
AbstractI am concerned with epistemic closure—the phenomenon in which some knowledge requires other knowledge. In particular, I defend a version of the closure principle in terms of analyticity; if an agent S knows that p is true and that q is an analytic part of p, then S knows that q. After targeting the relevant notion of analyticity, I argue that this principle accommodates intuitive cases and possesses the theoretical resources to avoid the preface paradox.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference57 articles.
1. Alspector-Kelly, M. (2019). Against Knowledge Closure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Angell, R. (1977). Three systems of first degree entailment. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 47(1), 147.
3. Angell, R. (1989). Deducibility, entailment and analytic containment. In J. Norma & R. Sylvan (Eds.), Directions in Relevance Logic (pp. 119–43). Berlin: Kluwer.
4. Angell, R. (2002). A-Logic. Lanham: University Press of America.
5. Becker, K. (2017). Deductive Closure Principle. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy .
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献