Abstract
AbstractConspiracy theories and conspiracy theorists have been accused of a great many sins, but are the conspiracy theories conspiracy theorists believe epistemically problematic? Well, according to some recent work (such as Cassam Quassim, Keith Harris, and M. Guilia Napolitano), yes, they are. Yet a number of other philosophers (myself included) like Brian L. Keeley, Charles Pigden, Kurtis Hagen, Lee Basham, and the like have argued ‘No!’ I will argue that there are features of certain conspiracy theories which license suspicion of such theories. I will also argue that these features only license a limited suspicion of these conspiracy theories, and thus we need to be careful about generalising from such suspicions to a view of the warrant of conspiracy theories more generally. To understand why, we need to get to the bottom of what exactly makes us suspicious of certain conspiracy theories, and how being suspicious of a conspiracy theory does not always tell us anything about how likely the theory in question is to be false.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference42 articles.
1. Ahadzadeh, A.S. , Ong, F.S. & Wu, S.L. (2021). Social media skepticism and belief in conspiracy theories about COVID-19: the moderating role of the dark triad. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02198-1
2. Basham, L. (2001). Living with the conspiracy. The Philosophical Forum, XXXII3, 265–280.
3. Basham, L. (2011). Conspiracy theory and rationality. In C. Jensen & R. Harré (Eds.), Beyond rationality (pp. 49–87). Newcastle on Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
4. Basham, L. (2016). Between two generalisms: A reply to stokes., 5(12), 4–14.
5. Basham, L. (2018a). Conspiracy theory particularism, both epistemic and moral. In In versus generalism. M.R.X. Dentith (ED.), (Ed.), Taking conspiracy theories seriously (pp. 39–58). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献