Abstract
AbstractNoncommutative geometries generalize standard smooth geometries, parametrizing the noncommutativity of dimensions with a fundamental quantity with the dimensions of area. The question arises then of whether the concept of a region smaller than the scale—and ultimately the concept of a point—makes sense in such a theory. We argue that it does not, in two interrelated ways. In the context of Connes’ spectral triple approach, we show that arbitrarily small regions are not definable in the formal sense. While in the scalar field Moyal–Weyl approach, we show that they cannot be given an operational definition. We conclude that points do not exist in such geometries. We therefore investigate (a) the metaphysics of such a geometry, and (b) how the appearance of smooth manifold might be recovered as an approximation to a fundamental noncommutative geometry.
Funder
John Templeton Foundation
American Council of Learned Societies
Institute of Philosophy, University of London
MINECO
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference42 articles.
1. Bain, J. (2003). Einstein algebras and the hole argument. Philosophy of Science, 70(5), 1073–1085.
2. Barrett, J. A. (1999). The quantum mechanics of minds and worlds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Belot, G. (2003). Notes on symmetries. In K. Brading & E. Castellani (Eds.), Symmetries in physics: Philosophical reflection (pp. 393–412). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bozkaya, H., Fischer, P., Grosse, H., Pitschmann, M., Putz, V., Schweda, M., et al. (2003). Space-time noncommutative field theories and causality. European Physical Journal C, 29, 133–141.
5. Bridgman, P. W. (1927). The logic of modern physics (Vol. 3). New York: Macmillan.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献