Einstein Algebras and the Hole Argument

Author:

Bain Jonathan

Abstract

Einstein algebras have been suggested (Earman 1989) and rejected (Rynasiewicz 1992) as a way to avoid the hole argument against spacetime substantivalism. In this article, I debate their merits and faults. In particular, I suggest that a gauge-invariant interpretation of Einstein algebras that avoids the hole argument can be associated with one approach to quantizing gravity, and, for this reason, is at least as well motivated as sophisticated substantivalist and relationalist interpretations of the standard tensor formalism.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy,History

Reference20 articles.

1. Emergence of Time;Heller;Emergence of Time,1998

2. Rings, Holes, and Substantivalism: On the Program of Leibniz Algebras;Rynasiewicz;Rings, Holes, and Substantivalism: On the Program of Leibniz Algebras,1992

3. Pooley, Oliver (2001), “Relationism Rehabilitated? II: Relativity”, preprint PITT-PHIL-SCI00000221

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Representation and Spacetime: The Hole Argument Revisited;International Studies in the Philosophy of Science;2022-11-27

2. Smooth Infinitesimals in the Metaphysical Foundation of Spacetime Theories;Journal of Philosophical Logic;2022-02-25

3. An algebraic approach to physical fields;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A;2021-10

4. Missing the point in noncommutative geometry;Synthese;2021-01-18

5. Why Not Categorical Equivalence?;Hajnal Andréka and István Németi on Unity of Science;2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3