Abstract
AbstractSpecial relativity has been understood by many as vindicating a tenseless conception of time, denying the existence of tensed facts and a fortiori objective temporal passage. The reason for this is straightforward: both passage and the obtaining of tensed facts require a universal knife-edge present moment—yet this structure is not easily reconcilable with the relativity of simultaneity. The above being said, the prospects for tense and passage are sometimes claimed to be improved on moving to cosmological solutions of general relativity. In this paper, we evaluate in detail these arguments, finding that there remain several open questions to be addressed if the introduction of tensed facts into the relativistic context is to be compelling. Moreover, we argue that, even setting aside these issues, objective tense stands and falls in relativity for exactly the same reasons that it does in classical philosophical discussions on the matter.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference54 articles.
1. Arkani-Hamed, N., Cheng, H.-C., Luty, M., & Thaler, J. (2005). Universal dynamics of spontaneous Lorentz violation and a new spin-dependent inverse-square law force. Journal of High Energy Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2005/07/029.
2. Balashov, Y., & Janssen, M. (2003). Critical notice: Presentism and relativity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54(2), 237–246.
3. Belot, G. (2005). Dust, time and symmetry. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56, 255–291.
4. Bourne, C. (2005). A future for presentism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Bourne, C. (2010). A future for presentism (pp. 201–202).
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献