Abstract
AbstractAccording to one prominent view of exercising abilities (e.g., Millar in Acta Anal 24(4):223–236, 2009), a subject, S, counts as exercising an ability to $$ \phi $$
ϕ
if and only if S successfully $$ \phi $$
ϕ
s. Such an ‘exercise-success’ thesis looks initially very plausible for abilities, perhaps even obviously or analytically true. In this paper, however, I will be defending the position that one can in fact exercise an ability to do one thing by doing some entirely distinct thing, and in doing so I’ll highlight various reasons (epistemological, metaphysical and linguistic) that favor the alternative approach I develop over views that hold that the exercise of an ability is a success notion in the sense Millar maintains.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Social Sciences,Philosophy
Reference22 articles.
1. Card, O. S. (1985). Enders game. New York: Tor Books.
2. Chrisman, M. (2012). The normative evaluation of belief and the aspectual classification of belief and knowledge attributions. The Journal of Philosophy, 109(10), 588–612.
3. Ericsson, A., & Pool, R. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the new science of expertise. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
4. Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Oxford: Brooks/Cole.
5. Glazier, P. S., & Davids, K. (2009). Constraints on the complete optimization of human motion. Sports Medicine, 39(1), 15–28.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Trust and Trustworthiness;A Telic Theory of Trust;2024-05-23
2. Therapeutic Trust;A Telic Theory of Trust;2024-05-23
3. Trust, Vulnerability, and Monitoring;A Telic Theory of Trust;2024-05-23
4. Trust, Risk, and Negligence;A Telic Theory of Trust;2024-05-23
5. What Is Good Trusting?;A Telic Theory of Trust;2024-05-23