Children and the Argument from ‘Marginal’ Cases-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Children and the Argument from ‘Marginal’ Cases

Published:2010-07-28 Issue:3 Volume:14 Page:291-305
ISSN:1386-2820
Container-title:Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
language:en
Short-container-title:Ethic Theory Moral Prac

Author:

Mullin Amy

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10677-010-9241-z.pdf

Reference58 articles.

1. Baier A (1986) Trust and antitrust. Ethics 96(2):231–260

2. Becker L (1983) The priority of human interests. In: Miller H, Williams W (eds) Ethics and animals. Humana, Clifton, pp 225–242

3. Bernstein M (2002) Marginal cases and moral relevance. J Soc Philos 33(4):523–39

4. Berube M (2009) Equality, freedom, and/or justice for all: a response to Martha Nussbaum. Metaphilosophy 40(3–4):352–365

5. Bronfenbrenner U (1990) Discovering what families do. In: Blankenhorn D, Bayne S, Elshtain JB (eds) Rebuilding the nest: a new commitment to the American family. Family Service America, Milwaukee, pp 27–38

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Dimensions of Consciousness and the Moral Status of Brain Organoids;Neuroethics;2023-11-22

2. Morality, Modality, and Humans with Deep Cognitive Impairments;The Philosophical Quarterly;2023-09-18

3. Dilemas y ética del cuidado: conservar y cuidar la autonomía de la persona con demencia;Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría;2022-12

4. Sentientism, Motivation, and Philosophical Vulcans;Pacific Philosophical Quarterly;2022-07-12

5. A parent’s intuition is always right: Weighing intuitions in the debate over the nature of full moral status;Metaphilosophy;2021-09-25