On the Incoherence Objection to Rule-Utilitarianism-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

On the Incoherence Objection to Rule-Utilitarianism

Published:2016-02-02 Issue:4 Volume:19 Page:857-876
ISSN:1386-2820
Container-title:Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
language:en
Short-container-title:Ethic Theory Moral Prac

Author:

Rajczi Alex

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Philosophy

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10677-016-9687-8.pdf

Reference35 articles.

1. Card R (2004) Consequentialist teleology and the valuation of states of affairs. Eth Theory Moral Pract 7:253–265

2. Card R (2007) Inconsistency and the theoretical commitments of Hooker’s rule-consequentialism. Utilitas 19(2):243–258

3. Darwall S (1996) Reason, norm, and value. In: Schneewind JB (ed) Reason, ethics, and society. Open Court, Chicago, pp 20–38

4. Darwall S (1998) Philosophical ethics. Westview Press, Boulder

5. Diamond C (1996) Consequentialism and modern moral philosophy and in ‘modern moral philosophy’. In: Oderberg and Laing (eds) Human lives: critical essays on consequentialist bioethics. MacMillan, London, pp 13–38

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Act and Rule Consequentialism: A Synthesis;Moral Philosophy and Politics;2024-02-09

2. Semantic Template-based Convolutional Neural Network for Text Classification;ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing;2023-11-20

3. Veículos Autônomos e Equilíbrio Reflexivo Amplo Coletivo;Veritas (Porto Alegre);2023-11-13

4. Index;In the Name of Liberty;2021-09-01

5. Bibliography;In the Name of Liberty;2021-09-01