1. Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2010). Do author-suggested reviewers rate submissions more favorably than editor-suggested reviewers? A study on atmospheric chemistry and physics. PLoS ONE,5(10), e13345.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013345
.
2. Earnshaw, J. J., Farndon, J. R., Guillou, P. J., Johnson, C. D., Murie, J. A., & Murray, G. D. (2000). A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England,82(4), 133–135.
3. Fox, W. C., Burns, C. S., Anna, D. M., & Mayer, A. J. (2016). Author-suggested reviewers: Gender differences and influences on the peer review process at an ecology journal. Functional Ecology,31(1), 270–280.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12665
.
4. Jefferson, T., Alderson, P., Walger, E., & Davidoff, F. (2002). Effects of editorial peer review: A systematic review. JAMA,287(21), 1–4.
5. Jelicic, M., & Merckelbach, H. (2002). Peer-review: Let’s imitate the lawyers! Cortex,38(3), 406–407.