An Ethical Framework for the Design, Development, Implementation, and Assessment of Drones Used in Public Healthcare

Author:

Cawthorne DylanORCID,Robbins-van Wynsberghe Aimee

Abstract

AbstractThe use of drones in public healthcare is suggested as a means to improve efficiency under constrained resources and personnel. This paper begins by framing drones in healthcare as a social experiment where ethical guidelines are needed to protect those impacted while fully realizing the benefits the technology offers. Then we propose an ethical framework to facilitate the design, development, implementation, and assessment of drones used in public healthcare. Given the healthcare context, we structure the framework according to the four bioethics principles: beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice, plus a fifth principle from artificial intelligence ethics: explicability. These principles are abstract which makes operationalization a challenge; therefore, we suggest an approach of translation according to a values hierarchy whereby the top-level ethical principles are translated into relevant human values within the domain. The resulting framework is an applied ethics tool that facilitates awareness of relevant ethical issues during the design, development, implementation, and assessment of drones in public healthcare.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)

Reference100 articles.

1. Bajde, D., Bruun, M. H., Sommer, J. K., & Waltorp, K. (2017). General public’s privacy concerns regarding drone use in residential and public areas. In Technical report: Syddansk Universitet og Aalborg Universitet.

2. Bajde, D., Woerman, N., Bruun, M. H., Gahrn-Andersen, R., Sommer, J. K., Nøjgaard, M., Bucher, J. H. (2017). Public reactions to drone use in residential and public areas.

3. BBC. (2017). DJI drones to gain privacy mode after US Army ban. BBC. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-40935860.

4. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

5. Blank, P., Kirrane, S., & Spiekermann, S. (2018). Privacy-aware restricted areas for unmanned aerial systems. IEEE Security & Privacy, 16(2), 70–79.

Cited by 42 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3