1. Amero, S. A. (2015). Enhancing peer review: Expectation for service on NIH peer review and advisory groups.
https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-10-089.html
. Accessed November 2018.
2. Arns, M. (2014). Open access is tiring out peer reviewers. Nature,515(7528), 467–467.
3. CDMRP. (2018). CDMRP’s two-tiered review process.
http://cdmrp.army.mil/about/2tierRevProcess
. Accessed November 2018.
4. DataUSA. (2016). Biochemistry, biophysics and molecular biology: Diversity.
https://datausa.io/profile/cip/26/?compare=2602
. Accessed November 2018.
5. Gallo, S., Thompson, L., Schmaling, K., & Glisson, S. (2018). Risk evaluation in peer review of grant applications. Environment Systems and Decisions,38, 216–229.