Nurses’ Motivations, Barriers, and Facilitators to Engage in a Peer Review Process: A Qualitative Study Protocol

Author:

Belo Fernandes Júlio123ORCID,Domingos Josefa12ORCID,Dean John4,Fernandes Sónia23,Ferreira Rogério56ORCID,Baixinho Cristina Lavareda78ORCID,Castro Cidália123ORCID,Simões Aida123ORCID,Bernardes Catarina123ORCID,Almeida Ana Silva9,Loureiro Sónia10,Ferreira Noélia19,Santos Isabel11,Godinho Catarina123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Grupo de Patologia Médica, Nutrição e Exercício Clínico (PaMNEC), 2829-511 Almada, Portugal

2. Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), 2829-511 Almada, Portugal

3. Escola Superior de Saúde Egas Moniz, 2829-511 Almada, Portugal

4. Triad Solutions, Aurora, CO 80012, USA

5. Instituto Politécnico de Beja, Escola Superior de Saúde, Departamento de Saúde, 7800-111 Beja, Portugal

6. Comprehensive Health Research Center, 7004-516 Évora, Portugal

7. Nursing School of Lisbon, 1900-160 Lisbon, Portugal

8. Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), 1900-160 Lisbon, Portugal

9. Department of Nursing, Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal E.P.E., 2910-446 Setúbal, Portugal

10. Department of Nursing, Hospital Garcia de Orta E.P.E., 2805-267 Almada, Portugal

11. Department of Nursing, Unidade de Cuidados na Comunidade de Palmela, 2950-483 Palmela, Portugal

Abstract

Peer review supports the integrity and quality of scientific publishing. However, although it is a fundamental part of the publishing process, peer review can also be challenging for reviewers, editors, and other stakeholders. The present study aims to explore the nurses’ motivations, barriers, and facilitators in engaging in a peer review process. This qualitative, descriptive exploratory study will be developed in partnerships with three research centers. Researchers followed the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist to ensure the quality of this study protocol. According to the selection criteria, the purposive sampling will be used to recruit nurse researchers that act as peer reviewers for several scientific journals in various fields of knowledge. Interviews will be conducted until data have been sufficiently consistent with meeting the initial objectives. Researchers will develop a guide comprising a set of open-ended questions to collect participants’ characteristics, descriptive review behavior, and perceptions regarding their motivations, barriers, and facilitators. Researchers will analyze data using an inductive process of content analysis with the help of the QDA Miner Lite database. Findings from this study will generate knowledge that may help stakeholders identify facilitating factors and barriers and guide the development of strategies to remove or minimize these barriers.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference41 articles.

1. Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide;Jacalyn;EJIFCC,2014

2. What is open peer review? A systematic review;F1000Research,2017

3. Peer review motivation frames: A qualitative approach;Zaharie;Eur. Manag. J.,2016

4. Process and quality of peer review in scientific Nursing journals;Chien;Nurs. Rep.,2011

5. Peer review: The cornerstone of scientific publishing integrity;Hillard;Climacteric,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3