1. ASIIN, Akkreditierungsagentur für Studiengänge der Ingenieurwissenschaften, der Informatik, der Naturwissenschaften und der Mathematik [Accreditation Agency for Engineering Science-, Computer Science-, Natural Science and Mathematics Curricula]. (2011). Subject specific criteria relating to the accreditation of bachelor’s and master’s degree programmes in life sciences. http://www.asiin-ev.de/media/feh/ASIIN_TC_10_Life_Sciences_2011-12-09.pdf . Accessed 18 Sept 2013.
2. Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, Republic of Korea and Switzerland (on behalf of the “JACKSNNZ”), and Kenya, Sweden, Ukraine, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America. (2011). Possible approaches to education and awareness-raising among life scientists. BWC/CONF.VII/WP.20/Rev.1, United Nations, Geneva, 1 December. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G11/650/58/PDF/G1165058.pdf?OpenElement . Accessed 18 Sept 2013.
3. Bradford University Dual-Use Bioethics. http://www.brad.ac.uk/bioethics/ . Accessed 18 Sept 2013.
4. Carlson, R., & Frankel, M. S. (2011). Reshaping responsible conduct of research. Professional ethics report winter 2011. American Association for the Advancement of Science, XXIV, 1–3.
5. Dando, M. R., & Rappert, B. (2005). Codes of conduct for the life sciences: Some insights from UK Academia Bradford Briefing Paper No. 16 (2nd Series). http://www.brad.ac.uk/acad/sbtwc/briefing/BP_16_2nd series.pdf. Accessed 18 Sept 2013.