Abstract
Abstract
The emergence of synthetic biology holds the potential of a major breakthrough in the life sciences by transforming biology into a predictive science. The dual-use characteristics of similar breakthroughs during the twentieth century have led to the application of benignly intended research in e.g. virology, bacteriology and aerobiology in offensive biological weapons programmes. Against this background the article raises the question whether the precautionary governance of synthetic biology can aid in preventing this techno-science witnessing the same fate? In order to address this question, this paper proceeds in four steps: it firstly introduces the emerging techno-science of synthetic biology and presents some of its potential beneficial applications. It secondly analyses contributions to the bioethical discourse on synthetic biology as well as precautionary reasoning and its application to life science research in general and synthetic biology more specifically. The paper then identifies manifestations of a moderate precautionary principle in the emerging synthetic biology dual-use governance discourse. Using a dual-use governance matrix as heuristic device to analyse some of the proposed measures, it concludes that the identified measures can best be described as “patchwork precaution” and that a more systematic approach to construct a web of dual-use precaution for synthetic biology is needed in order to guard more effectively against the field’s future misuse for harmful applications.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)
Reference47 articles.
1. Arcuri, A. (2007). Reconstructing precaution, deconstructing misconceptions. Ethics & International Affairs,
21(3), 359–379.
2. Azumi, S., Hanai, T., & Liao, J. C. (2008). Non-fermentative pathways for synthesis of branched-chain higher alcohols as biofuels. Nature,
451(3 January 2008), 86–90.
3. BBSRC/EPSRC. (2010). Synthetic biology dialogue, London, June.
4. Bügl, Hans., et al. (2007). DNA synthesis and biological security. Nature Biotechnology,
25(6), 627–629.
5. Campos, Luis. (2009). That was the synthetic biology that was. In M. Schmidt, A. Kelle, A. Ganguli-Mitra, & H. de Vriend (Eds.), Synthetic biology. The technoscience and its societal consequences (pp. 5–21). Berlin: Springer.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The view of synthetic biology in the field of ethics: a thematic systematic review;Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology;2024-05-28
2. Articulating the social responsibilities of translational science;Humanities and Social Sciences Communications;2024-01-09
3. Stronger regulation of AI in biomedicine;Science Translational Medicine;2023-09-13
4. Governance and Participation in Policy Literature on Synthetic Biology;SpringerBriefs in Philosophy;2023
5. Genetic Engineering;Precautionary Reasoning in Environmental and Public Health Policy;2021